<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Network research and no mention of Facebook, Twitter et al?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicaleducator.co.uk/social-network-research-and-no-mention-of-facebook-twitter-et-al.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicaleducator.co.uk/social-network-research-and-no-mention-of-facebook-twitter-et-al.html</link>
	<description>Medical students - get help passing and revise for your medical student exams with our multi choice questions (MCQs/EMQs), videos, podcasts and downloads. Free resources give it a trial!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://medicaleducator.co.uk/social-network-research-and-no-mention-of-facebook-twitter-et-al.html/comment-page-1#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicaleducator.co.uk/?p=240#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Absolutely Anne, I couldn&#039;t agree more. It was a bit of a tongue in cheek jest fro the benefit of the online community! Hijacked by the web community.

But...
I don&#039;t know if you saw the BMJ cover. Very trendy. Its essentially a plain yellow page with a smiley face on it. As first I thought they were reporting on LSD....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely Anne, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. It was a bit of a tongue in cheek jest fro the benefit of the online community! Hijacked by the web community.</p>
<p>But&#8230;<br />
I don&#8217;t know if you saw the BMJ cover. Very trendy. Its essentially a plain yellow page with a smiley face on it. As first I thought they were reporting on LSD&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Marie Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://medicaleducator.co.uk/social-network-research-and-no-mention-of-facebook-twitter-et-al.html/comment-page-1#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Marie Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicaleducator.co.uk/?p=240#comment-520</guid>
		<description>So what term do you think the authors should have used? Journal articles are and should be written using established terminology and this is the correct use of soical network.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what term do you think the authors should have used? Journal articles are and should be written using established terminology and this is the correct use of soical network.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://medicaleducator.co.uk/social-network-research-and-no-mention-of-facebook-twitter-et-al.html/comment-page-1#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicaleducator.co.uk/?p=240#comment-519</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, and I think that its now a pretty general use of the term...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, and I think that its now a pretty general use of the term&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bhan</title>
		<link>http://medicaleducator.co.uk/social-network-research-and-no-mention-of-facebook-twitter-et-al.html/comment-page-1#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicaleducator.co.uk/?p=240#comment-518</guid>
		<description>It is a bit misleading.  While the study focuses on a traditional &#039;Social Network&#039; of real, live, people and their relationships over time, &#039;Social Network&#039; in today&#039;s world has a very different meaning.

Or maybe we have been using Social Network improperly, I think the digital inclined have shortened &#039;Online Social Networks&#039; or &#039;Virtual Social Networks&#039; to just &#039;Social Network&#039; which has a much broader scope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a bit misleading.  While the study focuses on a traditional &#8216;Social Network&#8217; of real, live, people and their relationships over time, &#8216;Social Network&#8217; in today&#8217;s world has a very different meaning.</p>
<p>Or maybe we have been using Social Network improperly, I think the digital inclined have shortened &#8216;Online Social Networks&#8217; or &#8216;Virtual Social Networks&#8217; to just &#8216;Social Network&#8217; which has a much broader scope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

